How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Tradogram's ads lose the buyer

Tradogram is running 10 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.8 out of 10, and 3 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Tradogram’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Tradogram’s live ads, scored against their buyer

A requisition is a request to buy. A purchase order is a commitment to a supplie, scored 7/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Sharp hook on a real procurement risk, but no CTA or next step to capture intent.
Still managing purchasing with spreadsheets, emails, and disconnected approvals?, scored 7/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Pain-first hook nails the ICP trigger and copy is on-point, though no price or proof visible in text line.
How much of last week did your procurement team spend moving information between, scored 7/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Relatable pain hook with a clear feature visual, but no outcome proof or urgency to click now.
Your budget is what you're allowed to spend. Your committed spend is what you've, scored 8/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Spend visibility hook is sharp and specific, but no price anchor or CTA to close the loop.
Schedule a Consultation, scored 7/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Audit-readiness angle is a real ICP pain, but headline is generic consolidation and no price anchor to lower risk.
Explore Tradogram Essentials today., scored 8/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Anti-enterprise positioning with $99 price and feature checklist lands cleanly for the mid-market ICP.
Make purchasing easier for everyone involved., scored 6/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Feature orbit visual is clear but the headline is a generic consolidation claim with no pain or proof to earn the click.
Setting the target is the easy part of setting a procurement goal. Most teams ca, scored 6/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership hook is clever but the link to Tradogram's product is buried and the CTA is absent.
Many organizations know their purchasing process is broken but stay with it anyw, scored 7/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Fast implementation vs enterprise drag is a strong mid-market differentiator, though the body copy hook is passive.
Tradogram Procurement Software Try Our Procurement Software, scored 5/10 against Tradogram’s ideal buyer. Keyword-stuffed headline and generic body copy offer no specific pain hook, though sitelinks add useful navigation.

See Tradogram’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.