How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Storylane's ads lose the buyer

Storylane is running 18 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.9 out of 10, and 4 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Storylane’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Storylane’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Every sales call starts with 15 minutes of wasted time. "What's your use case?" , scored 8/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Sharp pain hook lands perfectly for sales reps tired of repetitive discovery, but 'upcoming launch' undercuts urgency.
Chat with RepX today!, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Pipeline-loss framing hits the inbound lead capture pain squarely, but CTA is generic and proof is absent.
A lot of marketers claim that they want their website to be their “best sales re, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Relatable marketer tension hooks well and the pricing visual adds credibility.
Alan Sincich from Hospitable.com summed up what stood out about Storylane RepX p, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Named customer quote and demo-in-chat proof land well for the ICP, but 'conversational' is soft as a lead differentiator.
Chat with RepX today!, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Traffic-to-CRM gap framing is sharp and the product UI shows demo-in-chat, but CTA 'Chat with RepX today' undersells the outcome.
We spent four months figuring out what to name Storylane 's newest product. Here, scored 5/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Brand / product launch post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
Why are so many website visitors filling out forms with fake names? Because they, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Fake-name hook names a real buyer frustration and sets up the gating-too-early pain the ICP lives with daily.
Most websites are running the wrong AI agent. Here's what I mean: One of our Sto, scored 8/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. 200-conversation stat plus five named insights give dense, specific proof that unanswered visitor questions cost pipeline.
Your website has one job: answer the question that brought them there. Most site, scored 6/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Website-one-job hook is punchy.
Chat with RepX today!, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Outcome headline is clear and the qualification-flow visual ties directly to the ICP pain of unqualified inbound traffic.
Most website chatbots are garbage (especially the rule-based ones). Rip and repl, scored 8/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Seven-row comparison table gives the ICP buyer a concrete, scannable reason to replace their current chatbot with RepX.
A customer took the time to send me this message. And it made my week. 👇 This c, scored 5/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Brand proof post with strong ICP testimonial but no offer or CTA to act on.
Chat with RepX today!, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Crisp three-verb promise nails the 24/7 qualification pain but lacks any proof or urgency.
Chat with RepX today!, scored 8/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Specific 80% stat plus a real use-case quote makes the value concrete and credible for the ICP.
Demos For The Entire GTM Team, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. GTM-team framing and 3000-plus social proof land well.
Better Spara Alternative, scored 7/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Competitor displacement framing is sharp for in-market buyers but 'Spara' is an obscure reference that limits reach.
Better Qualified Alternative See It, scored 8/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Direct Qualified displacement with three concrete capability claims targets an actively comparing buyer perfectly.
AI Interactive Demo Software, scored 5/10 against Storylane’s ideal buyer. Category-level headline matches the query but body copy is vague and misses a specific outcome or proof point.

See Storylane’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.