How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where SharpLaunch's ads lose the buyer

SharpLaunch is running 11 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 5.9 out of 10, and 6 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of SharpLaunch’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

SharpLaunch’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Clean, organized, and instantly credible., scored 7/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Named customer and product screenshot land well, but no outcome metric seals the proof.
2 out of 3 in-house AI projects fail. If your CRE firm is rushing to build its o, scored 7/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Strong POV on CRE AI risk; bridge to product solution is light.
Change something once. Everything updates., scored 8/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Segment-specific hook, a concrete workflow promise, and a product UI card make the value instantly tangible for NAI marketers.
3 data gaps costing you CRE leads, scored 6/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Asset promise is vague; 'more visibility, more deals' skips what the checklist actually contains.
Thinking of Leaving Buildout?, scored 7/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Sharp rival-departure hook with a concrete workflow benefit, but no outcome number to seal the switch.
Buildout vs. SharpLaunch, scored 6/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Names the rival clearly but 'slow workflows and friction' is generic without a specific outcome or proof point.
Request Free Demo CRE Marketing, scored 3/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Zero context about what the product does or why this buyer should care before the demo ask.
SharpLaunch CRE Marketing Platform, scored 5/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Sitelinks add useful depth but the headline copy is a brand name only with no hook or outcome.
SharpLaunch Property Websites No Code, scored 6/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. No-code angle matches the ICP pain well but 'Find Out More' is a weak CTA with no outcome stated.
Request Free Demo CRE Website, scored 3/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Identical to ad 3 with a different URL path, still zero product context before the demo ask.
All-in-One vs. Buildout Comparison, scored 7/10 against SharpLaunch’s ideal buyer. Rival named in body and sitelinks, side-by-side comparison promised, but headline leads with brand not the objection.

See SharpLaunch’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.