Where Selector AI's ads lose the buyer

Selector AI is running 3 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.3 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Selector AI’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Selector AI’s live ads, scored against their buyer

• AI活用でネットワーク運用効率化 - ネットワーク運用の未来を解説, scored 6/10 against Selector AI’s ideal buyer. AIOps angle fits NetOps buyers but staffing framing dilutes the core MTTR and alert-noise pain.
• AIでネットワーク運用を自動化 - AIOpsの基礎知識をまとめて解説, scored 6/10 against Selector AI’s ideal buyer. Automation headline targets the right buyer but knowledge-shortage framing misses the alert-storm and MTTR urgency.
• ServiceNowと外部システムを連携 - ServiceNowの機能を最大限に活用, scored 7/10 against Selector AI’s ideal buyer. Alert-volume and duplicate-ticket reduction directly names the ICP pain, and the ServiceNow integration is a concrete differentiator.

See Selector AI’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.