How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where SandboxAQ's ads lose the buyer

SandboxAQ is running 18 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7.4 out of 10, and 3 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of SandboxAQ’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

SandboxAQ’s live ads, scored against their buyer

We recently shared news of our Nature Communications paper with Baylor College o, scored 7/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Nature Communications proof and named academic partner signal credibility to biopharma R&D buyers, but no CTA or offer.
No structure? Rank anyway., scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Sharp hook nails the exact bottleneck drug discovery leads face, and sequence-plus-SMILES specificity proves physics-grounded capability.
Congratulations to our SandboxAQ colleagues Rae (Rui) Qi , Ly Le , and Andrea Bo, scored 5/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Brand post celebrating a team milestone, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
Explore AQCat Directly in Claude, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Highly specific claim and live UI proof land well for materials discovery buyers, but no quantified speedup stated.
DFT simulations can deliver powerful insights—but the computational cost and tim, scored 7/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Copy speaks directly to the DFT cost pain felt by computational chemistry leaders, solid ICP fit.
Explore AQCat Directly in Claude, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Seconds-not-days claim with real UI output is a compelling proof point for catalyst development buyers.
You decide what deserves to go further., scored 5/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Aspirational creative with no product claim, no proof, and no specific outcome for the technical buyer.
Rank Drug Candidates in Seconds. No 3D Structure Required., scored 9/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Headline removes two blockers at once, seconds speed plus no 3D structure, with live kinome scan UI as proof.
Focus Your Lab on the Most Promising Candidates, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Uncertainty quantification and applicability scores address the hallucination-free accuracy need precisely.
What if DFT-level insights didn’t require days of computation? AQCat™ delivers a, scored 7/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Headline question frames the core pain sharply and AQCat spin-polarized claim is technically credible for the ICP.
Docking-equivalent ranking, no crystal structure needed, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Statistically equivalent to physics-based docking is a bold, falsifiable claim that earns trust from drug discovery leads.
Rank Compounds Swiftly, Without a Crystal Structure, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Docking-quality ranking without crystal structure hits a sharp drug discovery pain point with a real product UI shown.
You decide what deserves to go further., scored 5/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership or brand post with no product pitch, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
DFT-grade adsorption accuracy, up to 20,000x faster, scored 9/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Quantified speed claim against a gold-standard method with real surface data shown lands precisely on the materials scientist pain point.
Ready to explore AQPotency?, scored 7/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Concrete trial framing with cost-before-synthesis logic is solid but the CTA question softens urgency for a senior buyer.
Magnetic materials have long presented a challenge for accurate, efficient compu, scored 7/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Spin-aware modeling for magnetic materials is a precise, underserved pain point that resonates with materials and catalyst R&D buyers.
Millions of compounds ranked against your target in seconds. About $1 per thousa, scored 8/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Stacked quantified claims, speed plus cost per thousand, give the drug discovery buyer an immediate, concrete reason to watch.
Every Prediction Includes a Confidence Interval, scored 9/10 against SandboxAQ’s ideal buyer. Uncertainty quantification as a headline feature directly addresses the hallucination-free, high-stakes accuracy need at the core of the ICP.

See SandboxAQ’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.