How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where qashqade's ads lose the buyer

qashqade is running 18 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7 out of 10, and 5 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of qashqade’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

qashqade’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Turn your AI chats into precise answers about your allocations, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Directly addresses the AI-plus-accuracy tension that triggers purchase, with a live product demo on the creative.
Precision at scale for modern fund admins, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Hits the fund admin segment squarely but the headline stays generic where specifics on waterfall or carry would sharpen it.
Calculations that create clarity and deliver transparency, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. LPA-spec waterfall configurability is exactly the pain point, and the product UI reinforces the claim with real workflow detail.
Centralise and communicate stakeholder information with bulletproof control, scored 6/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Stakeholder portal angle is relevant but 'bulletproof control' is vague where carry accuracy and audit-readiness would land harder.
For a while now we've been getting one question from clients running AC (Artific, scored 5/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Product-launch announcement with no buyer pain or outcome stated, leaving the ICP to guess why the MCP layer matters to them.
Accuracy your LPs can verify, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Headline nails the LP transparency pain and carry explainability gap that defines the ICP trigger, with product proof on the creative.
Precise allocation calculations built for private markets, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. LPA-to-model framing speaks directly to the waterfall accuracy pain, and the product UI on the creative reinforces credibility.
Calculations that create clarity and deliver transparency, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Spreadsheet pain call-out and waterfall automation are on-ICP, but the headline is generic where a sharper outcome claim would win.
qashqade Summer Survey 2026 - Share your thoughts!, scored 5/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Brand and community engagement post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
Audits. LP questions. Internal reviews. Are your private markets calculations re, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Audit-readiness and AI-guardrail framing hit the ICP trigger well, though 'modern fund managers' is softer than naming the exact buyer role.
Flexible, data-driven reporting built directly on your allocation calculations, scored 6/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Reporting-on-calculations angle is relevant but the headline leads with a feature benefit rather than the audit or LP scrutiny pain that drives urgency.
Eliminate spreadsheet risk for good, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Clear ICP call-out and product proof, but 'better outputs, better outcomes' tagline is generic filler.
Precisely calculate and communicate carry, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Carry precision and partner economics hit the right nerve, but product UI screenshot adds little without a callout.
Validate your GP's waterfall calculations independently, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. LP fee-validation angle is a sharp, underserved ICP hook with a clear action and LPA Validation UI as proof.
Eliminate spreadsheet risk in complex waterfall calculations, scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Specific mechanic list, European and American waterfalls, clawbacks, NAV fees, speaks directly to the fund ops buyer's daily pain.
Turn into a tech-enabled fund admin, scored 6/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Correct segment but 'increasingly expect' is vague corporate speak with no concrete outcome or differentiator.
Traditional or AI-enabled: with qashqade, it's not a trade-off. Under the hood, , scored 8/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Deterministic engine and identical audit trail directly address the AI-accuracy tension named in the ICP trigger.
The system of record for your allocations, scored 7/10 against qashqade’s ideal buyer. Auditable system-of-record framing and AI guardrail line are on-point, but 'modern fund managers' is a softer ICP signal than it could be.

See qashqade’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.