Where PostHog's ads lose the buyer

PostHog is running 3 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 8.3 out of 10, and 0 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of PostHog’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

PostHog’s live ads, scored against their buyer

• Root cause is usually not the first error you see. PostHog keeps errors, logs, a, scored 8/10 against PostHog’s ideal buyer. Nails the exact engineer pain of chasing errors across disconnected tools, with unified context as the payoff.
• We run this on PostHog itself. Over 90 scouts read the app's own data, investiga, scored 9/10 against PostHog’s ideal buyer. Concrete AI-agent proof point lands perfectly on the ICP's emerging need to feed product context to coding agents.
• 97% of PostHog customers pay them $0. That is the first stat that PostHog has un, scored 8/10 against PostHog’s ideal buyer. Free tier proof, 500k social proof, and AI agent framing hit the ICP squarely, though the creative is dense with competing CTAs.

See PostHog’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.