How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B SaaS spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Personetics's ads lose the buyer

Personetics is running 24 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 5.8 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Personetics’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Personetics’s live ads, scored against their buyer

How to Win Open Banking through Action, scored 5/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership hook is on-topic but offers no proof, outcome, or reason to click beyond curiosity.
72% of Banks Are Flying Blind With Incomplete Customer Data. Register For the Webinar to Learn How to Turn That Around., scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Sharp stat in the headline but the creative pivots to Relationship Manager framing, diluting the senior digital banking buyer signal.
In today’s financial landscape, banks aren't suffering from a lack of&, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Data-vs-context framing nails the core pain but the blog CTA is low-commitment and the creative adds no proof or urgency.
Proactive digital insights are a win-win for both banks and customers. Want to s, scored 7/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Named bank customer and senior speaker titles deliver real social proof, but no quantified outcome weakens the click incentive.
Thrilled to announce our partnership with Fiserv , embedding our AI-driven platf, scored 5/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Press-release framing and a stock-photo creative bury a genuinely relevant partnership announcement for Fiserv bank clients.
Book a meeting, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Strong creative proof with KeyBank and named speakers, but the headline 'Book a meeting' is a cold CTA with no value hook.
𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗭𝗲, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Exclusive executive forum with Bankwest and Microsoft co-branding signals credibility, but no stated topic or pain point to pull the right buyer in.
Stop losing clients to poor timing. Register for the webinar to learn how to turn that around., scored 7/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Deloitte Retail Banking speaker adds third-party credibility and the topic maps directly to the ICP pain, but the stat in the headline is unverified and the buyer role is slightly diffuse.
🚀 We are excited to announce our partnership with Atomic to deliver a native, e, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Outcome language lands well but press-release framing buries the buyer benefit behind the announcement.
Today, Personetics and Plaid announced a new partnership combining Plaid’s #Open, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Account primacy outcome is on-ICP but partnership announcement format gives no reason to click today.
Give Relationship Managers a Daily AI-Powered Call List. Register Now to See How., scored 8/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Named speakers including Deloitte principal add credibility and the AI call-list hook is specific and role-relevant.
Join our September 15th Webinar. See how AI surfaces the conversations that drive revenue, so you spend less time searching for leads and more time selling., scored 7/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Solid speaker proof and clear registration CTA but body copy pain framing is stronger than the creative headline.
Agentic AI Close Bank AI Gap, scored 7/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Urgency hook and stat land well, but 'convert poorly' is vague for a senior banking exec.
AI-Powered Money Management Banks, scored 4/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Headline repeats 'Money Management' twice and body targets bank customers, not the bank buyer.
Financial Management PFM for Banks, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. 50% engagement lift is a real proof point but PFM framing undersells the AI differentiation.
Money Management PFM Financial Banks, scored 5/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Deposits and engagement outcomes named but no number or proof anchors the claim.
Financial Management PFM Demo CTA, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. 50% engagement stat and demo CTA are solid but PFM label undersells the AI layer.
PFM Solutions for Banks Display, scored 5/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. Display banner names the right buyer but PFM framing is generic and no outcome is stated.
Smart PFM Tools For Banks, scored 6/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. The 50 percent engagement stat is a real proof point but 'Smart PFM Tools' undersells the AI differentiation.
Personetics PFM Bank Vendor, scored 4/10 against Personetics’s ideal buyer. 'Bank Vendor' headline is category-generic and the body lists features without a specific measurable outcome.

See Personetics’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.