How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where nOps's ads lose the buyer

nOps is running 16 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.6 out of 10, and 7 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of nOps’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

nOps’s live ads, scored against their buyer

nOps automates cloud commitment management, so you're never overpaying or underp, scored 8/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Names the exact pain and promises automation.
CFO AI 5, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. CFO role signal and AI cost anomaly hook are on-ICP, but content series framing dilutes urgency.
“Governance is a zero-day activity.” I liked this framing from Omkar Gokhale. AI, scored 5/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership framing with ICP-adjacent topic but no product offer or CTA visible in copy.
nOps automatically manages your cloud commitments, so your team stops guessing a, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Directly names the core pain of guessing on commitments and promises savings, solid ICP fit.
☁️ Last Week in FinOps — September 1 ☁️ A wave of launches dropped this week — h, scored 5/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Newsletter-style content play reaches the right audience but offers no product hook or reason to click.
1788968389767, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Sharp, specific pain hook for AI-native buyers overpaying on inference costs, live event adds urgency.
Part 2 CFO, scored 6/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. CFO-targeted AI pricing content is on-ICP but the headline is a bare internal label, not real ad copy.
ChatGPT Image Sep 30, 2026, 09_17_54 AM, scored 6/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. AI spend forecasting topic squarely hits CFO and FinOps buyers but the headline is a bare internal label.
☁️ Last Week in FinOps — September 21 ☁️ FinOps automation had a moment this wee, scored 5/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. FinOps news digest reaches the right audience but is pure content with no product offer or click incentive.
CFO’s Guide to AI FinOps, scored 6/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Right buyer, right topic, but the stat hook stays abstract with no savings outcome promised.
cfo 4, scored 5/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Hidden AI spend angle is intriguing.
Stop Paying Frontier Prices for Every AI Request, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Sharp cost pain for AI-native buyers, real practitioner speaker adds credibility, but no product CTA.
Commitment management means choosing the right option across 4 million SKUs, eve, scored 8/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. The 4 million SKU specificity nails the complexity pain that defines the ICP's core anxiety.
Governing AI Spend at Scale, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Roku case study and named practitioner give strong proof, but the webinar format softens urgency.
Switching commitment management vendors added $750K in additional annual savings, scored 9/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. Concrete dollar figure from a head-to-head vendor switch hits the exact switching trigger for this ICP.
nOps: Cloud Cost Optimization - Experience 50% Cost Savings - Talk to Our Experts, scored 7/10 against nOps’s ideal buyer. 50% savings claim and Kubernetes specifics match high-intent searchers well, though the guarantee needs a landing page to close.

See nOps’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.