How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B SaaS spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Netskope's ads lose the buyer

Netskope is running 12 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.8 out of 10, and 0 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Netskope’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Netskope’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Netskope Threat Labs: 2026 AI Report, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Sharp pain hook on AI governance, but report offer softens urgency for a CISO ready to buy.
Netskope Threat Labs: 2026 AI Report, scored 6/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Geo-specific threat research is relevant but body copy mismatch with creative dilutes the message.
Nouveau Magic Quadrant™ Gartner® pour les plateformes SASE, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Gartner MQ Leader proof is strong third-party validation, but CTA is generic for a cold CISO audience.
Netskope Threat Labs: 2026 AI Report, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Sharp pain hook on AI governance lands well, but no data point or proof to seal the click.
Leader du Magic Quadrant™ : SSE et Plateformes SASE, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Dual Gartner MQ Leader claim is strong proof for the right buyer, offer is clear.
Meet Netskope at Billington Cyber Summit, scored 6/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Tight federal segment fit but event invite format limits demand-gen pull beyond attendees.
Netskope: A Magic Quadrant™ SASE Leader, Highest in Execution, scored 8/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Specific Gartner differentiator 'Highest in Execution' gives buyers a concrete reason to prefer Netskope over other Leaders.
Together we can say yes, scored 5/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Brand-level campaign slogan is visually bold but too abstract to drive a specific buyer action.
A Magic Quadrant™ SASE Leader, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Dual MQ Leader proof is credible but 'Age of AI' framing is generic and the CTA is thin.
Netskope Threat Labs: 2026 AI Report, scored 8/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. 'Shadow AI risks and critical data loss trends in enterprises' names the exact pain the ICP is losing sleep over.
Netskope Threat Labs: 2026 AI Report, scored 7/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Solid pain hook on AI governance but identical creative to ad 0 with no added proof or differentiation.
Let’s build what AI needs, scored 6/10 against Netskope’s ideal buyer. Aspirational framing lands on-ICP but lacks any specific proof or concrete offer to earn the click.

See Netskope’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.