How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where n8n's ads lose the buyer

n8n is running 23 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.3 out of 10, and 12 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of n8n’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

n8n’s live ads, scored against their buyer

🚀 n8n 's In The Loop 2026 is going to be AMAZING. The agenda is stacked 🎙️ I'v, scored 5/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Brand/event post promoting a conference agenda, not a demand-gen ad; judge on brand lift, not buyer fit.
From prompts to agents: turning intent into enterprise action. Imagine describin, scored 6/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Intriguing hook for the right buyer but 'plain language to enterprise action' stays vague with no proof or concrete CTA.
The platform enterprise builds with, scored 7/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Named customer and a hard number make the proof land, though the enterprise headline undersells the technical control angle.
Start saving with n8n, scored 5/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Creative claim is broad and generic; community stats in body are social proof but miss the technical buyer's specific pain.
The platform enterprise builds with, scored 6/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Copy targets enterprise builders cleanly but headline repeats as body, leaving no additional proof or hook for the ICP.
Tired of bending your technical teams to fit someone else’s SaaS mold? With n8n,, scored 8/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Enterprise logo plus a hard pound figure dominates the creative, making ROI undeniable for a budget-holding technical buyer.
One of my favorite things about building n8n is seeing what people build with it, scored 5/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Brand and community event post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
Start saving with n8n, scored 8/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Hard named-customer ROI figure stops the scroll and earns the swipe from any enterprise buyer evaluating automation ROI.
Start saving with n8n, scored 7/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Strong enterprise proof on the creative but the text body pivots to a low-code pitch that dilutes the ROI signal mid-read.
n8n's first conference · 70% off for 72h, scored 5/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Brand/community event post; no product value prop for the technical buyer.
The platform enterprise builds with, scored 7/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Control and data ownership messaging lands squarely on ICP anxiety, but proof stats are generic volume numbers not outcomes.
n8n has earned the trust of enterprise leaders, powering 500+ integrations for a, scored 7/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. GitHub social proof and fair-code framing speak directly to the technical builder ICP, but copy stays at awareness level with no specific outcome.
The AI Orchestration Platform, scored 6/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Governance and multi-model framing is on-ICP but headline is a category label, not a differentiated hook.
Build AI Agents That Ship, scored 7/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. 'Stop building plumbing around agents' is a sharp pain-point hook that resonates with the developer ICP, though body repeats itself.
AI Workflow Automation Without Limits, scored 5/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Generic flexibility claim with no specific differentiator for the technical buyer evaluating control or self-hosting.
Pricing Build Complex Agentic Systems, scored 8/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Visual-plus-code flexibility and self-hosted sitelinks directly address the ICP's core build-vs-buy tension at the pricing decision moment.
Automate Without Limits AI Agent, scored 4/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Generic tagline and vague body miss the technical buyer's specific pain around control and integrations.
Build AI Agents That Ship, scored 8/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Sharp hook calls out the plumbing problem directly, and governance plus multi-model signals land squarely on the ICP.
SOC 2 AI Orchestration Platform, scored 8/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. SOC 2 mention and engineer-control framing hit the security and compliance pain the ICP cares most about.
n8n Official Website AI Automation, scored 6/10 against n8n’s ideal buyer. Visual editor plus code flexibility and 500 integrations are relevant but the branded headline wastes the hook slot.

See n8n’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.