How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Magnet Forensics's ads lose the buyer

Magnet Forensics is running 18 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7.4 out of 10, and 3 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Magnet Forensics’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Magnet Forensics’s live ads, scored against their buyer

There’s a gap between knowing something happened and truly understanding it. &#1, scored 6/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. eBook offer is relevant but headline is too abstract before the creative anchors it.
Trafficking cases are built on patterns. The same faces, the same locations, the, scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Tight use-case framing for law enforcement and intel buyers on a high-stakes mission.
Detection finds the problem. Forensics solves it., scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Crisp tension between detection and forensics lands squarely on the IR lead's real pain.
ICAC work means daily exposure to disturbing CSAM and it’s incredibly important , scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Hits a real, painful ICP nerve for law enforcement ICAC units, but investigator wellbeing angle is brand not product.
What 350+ DFIR pros won't say out loud, scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Peer-data hook with a specific sample size earns the click from private-sector DFIR pros wanting benchmarks.
No surprises on the stand: Pretrial preparation framework for investigators and digital device examiners - Magnet Forensics, scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Evidentiary-risk framing lands squarely on the examiner-attorney gap pain, though the stock photo undersells it.
Add Autokey to your vehicle forensics workflow, scored 9/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Side-by-side proof kills the legacy objection with three specific, quantified wins for vehicle forensics examiners.
Containment answers the first question. Forensics answers the rest., scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Rhetorical hook names the exact investigative gap IR leads feel after containment, with a clear e-book offer.
Incident response can no longer stop at containment. Today’s organizations need , scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Solid framing of the post-containment gap but headline is softer than ad 4 and the creative is harder to read.
From extraction to evidence review in 30 minutes, scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Specific 30-minute time claim with a real-world officer visual makes the vehicle forensics speed benefit concrete.
Your stack detects, correlates, and responds. It doesn't investigate., scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Reframes the buy-in objection for IR leads who already own EDR, SIEM, and SOAR, with a clever visual metaphor.
Vehicle evidence, without the teardown, scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Sharp pain-point hook with named product and clear extraction method, but no proof or CTA.
In nearly 30 years of law enforcement, I've witnessed the volume and complexity , scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Peer-voice credibility from a 30-year LE veteran lands well with the ICP, copy earns the watch.
I have trust issues. How do I overcome them? With facts. Not opinions, assumptio, scored 6/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Intriguing hook but the payoff is vague, leaving the buyer unsure what product or outcome is promised.
Digital forensics plays a critical role well beyond post‑incident review, when i, scored 7/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. DFIR lifecycle framing speaks directly to incident response leads, though the offer stays implicit.
Process more vehicles. Damage none of them., scored 8/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Dual benefit headline nails the evidentiary-integrity pain and throughput need in one punchy line.
Most experienced investigators know the difference between a good breach and a c, scored 6/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Experienced-investigator framing is on-ICP.
Modern vehicles hold more evidence than you think, scored 9/10 against Magnet Forensics’s ideal buyer. Memorable hook plus four labeled evidence types on the creative give the ICP buyer an immediate, specific reason to act.

See Magnet Forensics’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.