How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Luzmo's ads lose the buyer

Luzmo is running 24 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.9 out of 10, and 0 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Luzmo’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Luzmo’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Where do your users actually get answers from your product's data? Not where you, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Sharp ICP hook but the ask is a survey, not a product offer, limiting demand-gen pull.
Everyone is building their own analytics now. With an LLM, in a weekend, instead, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Provocative build-vs-buy tension lands perfectly on the ICP's core anxiety, but the survey CTA softens conversion.
If you're in product or engineering, you have probably had the MCP question by n, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Crisp role-specific question with a clear CTA and deadline, but survey format limits direct demand-gen intent.
Where does analytics live in your product now? A dashboard, a chat, a Slack chan, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Sharp ICP question with clear survey context, but the ask is research participation, not a product click.
If you’re responsible for analytics inside a software product, I’d like your inp, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. On-ICP framing but the creative hook is softer and the survey ask lacks the benchmark payoff that earns the click.
Last year, 200+ product and data leaders rated the dashboards they ship to their, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Specific peer benchmark number is a strong pattern interrupt, but the payoff for clicking is still just a survey.
Is your product's analytics still a 3.6?, scored 8/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Pointed challenge to the ICP's own adoption gap lands hard, and the benchmark payoff makes the six-minute ask feel worth it.
Is your product's analytics still a 3.6?, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Specific peer benchmark number is a strong pattern interrupt, but the payoff for clicking is still just a survey.
Is your product's analytics still a 3.6?, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Intriguing category-shift framing but too abstract to land the pain without the 3.6 proof anchor to make it concrete.
If you’re responsible for analytics inside a software product, I’d like to get y, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Richer visual of answer surfaces sharpens the ICP question, but the ask is still research participation over a product benefit.
Is your product's analytics still a 3.6?, scored 8/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Blunt self-assessment framing of the 3.6 score creates immediate recognition and ego tension that pulls the ICP to benchmark themselves.
Where do people actually go when they need an answer from your product data? A d, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Smart ICP hook but the ask is a survey, not a product click, so intent stays cold.
Best Embedded Analytics Tool Demo, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Clear category match and demo CTA but 'best' claim is generic with no differentiator.
SDK pour Produits de Donnees, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Speed promise and developer-choice claim land the core ICP pain in two lines.
SDK Data Products Customizable Tool, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Months-to-days proof point and developer positioning hit the ICP pain directly.
Top Power BI Alternative Embedded BI, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Competitor query match plus time-to-market proof targets an in-market buyer well.
SDK Data Products AI Analytics Sprint, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. One-sprint promise and AI angle hit the ICP speed pain cleanly.
Sisense Alternative Unique Analytics Experience, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Competitor query match and days-not-months proof target an in-market switcher well.
Powerful SDK Revenue Stream Demo, scored 7/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Revenue-stream angle reframes analytics as a product line, a sharp ICP hook.
Get A Demo Embedded Analytics, scored 6/10 against Luzmo’s ideal buyer. Clear offer and ICP fit but 'personalized reporting dashboards' undersells the embedded, multi-tenant value prop.

See Luzmo’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.