How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Lumar's ads lose the buyer

Lumar is running 17 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.6 out of 10, and 5 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Lumar’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Lumar’s live ads, scored against their buyer

In this free ✨80-page guide✨ to generative engine optimization (GEO) and answer , scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Timely, specific asset on a hot pain, but no teaser finding inside to justify 80 pages.
What skills should SEO pros develop in 2026 to stay competitive in today’s chang, scored 5/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Crowd-sourced skills list is useful but generic, no non-obvious finding teased to earn the click.
A #1 Google ranking used to be a pretty good sign that you owned the answer. Unf, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Sharp, provocative POV on AI search disruption lands well, but no bridge to Lumar's solution or next step.
Make your site the one AI agents choose, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Strong hook and full logistics land it, but no named speaker credential or exclusive draw beyond the topic.
GEO advice is moving faster than anyone can reasonably implement it. But chasing, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Punchy contrarian POV with a concrete checklist bridges well to Lumar's monitoring product, but no product bridge is explicit.
Most GEO advice right now is guesswork dressed up as strategy. Add schema. Write, scored 8/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Product UI screenshot showing a real AI Content Evaluation score makes the abstract tangible and bridges directly to Lumar's platform.
Free webinar: See your site the way AI agents do, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Provocative hook calling out a blind spot most teams have, with full logistics and a clear CTA, but no named speaker credential to lift draw.
Ask Claude who does what you do, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Clever interactive hook surfaces a real fear of AI invisibility and the creative closes with a direct demo CTA, but no proof or outcome shown.
Trusted by the World's Biggest Brands. Ready for Yours?Trusted by the World's Biggest Brands. Ready for Yours?, scored 5/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Named logos and a scale stat are solid proof, but the headline is generic and no specific outcome or CTA converts the credibility into action.
See Why Fortune 500 Teams Choose LumarSee Why Fortune 500 Teams Choose Lumar, scored 6/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Quote nails the unified-platform value prop and the Fortune 500 Retailer attribution is relatable, but no name, no metric, and no next step weakens conversion.
Every new shift in marketing seems to produce the same response, which is typica, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Sharp AI-reputation hook with concrete examples, but no CTA or next step to convert curiosity.
Ranking isn't the same as being cited, scored 6/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Clear pain hook and 'Book a demo' CTA, but no proof or specific outcome to justify the click.
The biggest GEO challenge for enterprise teams isn’t creating more AI-optimised , scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Non-obvious four-part framework earns attention, but no CTA or bridge to Lumar's product capability.
A prospect can drop you from the shortlist before your sales team ever hears the, scored 8/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Visceral scenario of AI-driven shortlisting without you lands the pain precisely for the ICP buyer.
Your brand already has an AI reputation. The question is whether you’re managing, scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Crisp measurement gap framing resonates with data-driven SEO leads, but no CTA or product bridge closes the loop.
Still Not Found on Google or Claude?Still Not Found on Google or Claude?, scored 5/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Multi-pain alert format is attention-grabbing but 'Find out why' CTA is too soft for a direct-conversion ad with no proof.
The uncomfortable truth is that both sides of this debate are partly right. AEO , scored 7/10 against Lumar’s ideal buyer. Provocative Reddit-post creative earns instant credibility with skeptical SEO practitioners, though the product bridge is implicit.

See Lumar’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.