How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where LimaCharlie's ads lose the buyer

LimaCharlie is running 10 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7.1 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of LimaCharlie’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

LimaCharlie’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Spin up a tenant and let your agents run security ops, scored 7/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. AI-agent framing with OpenAI co-branding lands squarely on ISV and AI SOC builder buyers, but no proof or CTA to close.
Any AI agent, built on any model, can start operating, scored 6/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Anthropic co-brand adds credibility but the message stays broad with no outcome or next step.
You AI operators that execute tasks end to end., scored 8/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Names the buyer, draws the assistant-vs-operator line sharply, but no CTA or next step.
“If you’re looking at our cost per endpoint…I think it’s more than cut in half”, scored 8/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Named customer, face, and a concrete cost-halving claim make this the strongest proof unit in the set.
Black Hills Built Their SOC on LimaCharlie, scored 7/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Named peer-brand proof is compelling for SOC buyers, but the weak CTA and missing outcome detail leave clicks on the table.
[The LimaCharlie] team is our team. Our team is [their] team. We’re working together and we’re solving problems.”, scored 5/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. The quote is warm but vague, conveying partnership feeling rather than a concrete API or scale benefit the ICP cares about.
"The ease of integration and the API [with LimaCharlie] was nothing short of spectacular”, scored 7/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Named customer praising the API hits a real ICP nerve, but the body copy stays generic and no outcome is quantified.
AI SOCs surface problems. AI operators solve them., scored 8/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. The surface-vs-solve contrast is the sharpest positioning hook in the set, and the visual workflow makes it concrete.
Build for AI agents from the ground up, scored 8/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Code snippet creative makes the API-first promise concrete and speaks directly to the builder ICP.
Spin up a tenant and let your agents run security ops, scored 7/10 against LimaCharlie’s ideal buyer. Nvidia logo lifts credibility and the stack list is specific, but no outcome or CTA anchors the click.

See LimaCharlie’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.