How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Juicebox (PeopleGPT)'s ads lose the buyer

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is running 12 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.5 out of 10, and 7 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s live ads, scored against their buyer

AI-Native Talent Intelligence 800M Profiles, scored 6/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Strong scale claim but no outcome or CTA anchors the click.
Juicebox Official Site Try Free, scored 7/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Free trial and demo sitelinks drive action, but headline is generic brand copy.
Switch from LI Recruiter 119/mo, scored 8/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Direct price comparison against LinkedIn Recruiter gives a sharp, concrete reason to click.
Hire Faster with AI Today, scored 6/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Speed promise lands but 'AI Today' is vague with no sourcing-specific proof or differentiator.
Number One Talent Sourcing Tool, scored 5/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. '#1' claim with no proof and 'better outreach results' is too generic to beat a skeptical recruiter's filter.
Try Juicebox Agents For Free, scored 7/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Free trial CTA with AI Agents framing is specific and low-friction, strong for high-intent sourcing queries.
Save 15 Percent with Juicebox, scored 6/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Cost savings hook is concrete but 'every profile' claim needs context and the switch promise feels thin.
Paradox AI Alternative Outbound, scored 8/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Crisp inbound-vs-outbound contrast plus 800M profiles gives a searcher a sharp, specific reason to click.
Zoho Recruit Alternative Juicebox, scored 6/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. 5,000 companies is solid social proof but 'scale smarter hiring' is too generic for a Zoho-switching query.
AI Sourcing Platform Official Site, scored 8/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. 'Seconds not hours' outcome plus rich sitelinks covering pricing, comparison, and free trial serve high-intent buyers well.
AI Candidate Sourcing Category Map, scored 5/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Educational category overview attracts researchers, not buyers ready to source, so it misses purchase intent.
Metaview Alternative Structured Hiring Signals, scored 6/10 against Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s ideal buyer. Competitor comparison hook is sharp but targets interview intelligence buyers, not sourcing pain.

See Juicebox (PeopleGPT)’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.