How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where GrowthX's ads lose the buyer

GrowthX is running 12 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.3 out of 10, and 7 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of GrowthX’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

GrowthX’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Today I'm excited to announce the next evolution of how GrowthX AI is helping br, scored 5/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Announcement hook lands but copy stops before naming what actually changed or why it matters.
We Calibrate It. You Run It - No Retainer, No Black Box, scored 6/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Anti-agency positioning is sharp but '100+ customers' is thin proof and no CTA is visible.
Map Every Buyer Question - Get Your AI Visibility Plan - growthx.ai, scored 7/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Crisp insight-led hook and clear AEO value prop, but no proof and sitelinks do the CTA heavy lifting.
The Next Era of AI Visibility - Built by SEO and AEO Experts, scored 7/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Strong ICP hook and a concrete proof point ('46x AI Referrals') but value proposition stays category-level with no outcome tied to the buyer.
Content Marketing, One System - Plan, Produce, Measure, Repeat, scored 6/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Consolidation pain is named well but no proof, no outcome number, and the 'Careers' sitelink dilutes the conversion intent.
Built by SEO and AEO Experts - Rank in Google and in AI, scored 6/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Dual-channel promise is on-ICP but the body stays generic with no proof, no number, and no CTA visible.
See GrowthX in Action - A System of Organic Growth, scored 5/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Category-level claim with no specific outcome or proof; 'gets smarter' is vague and the CTA is buried in the headline.
THE LAST PLATFORM AN ORGANIC GROWTH MARKETER WILL EVER NEED, scored 7/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Pain of tool sprawl is named sharply and the platform-vs-tool distinction is clear, but no proof or outcome number to back the bold claim.
Get a Custom Growth Plan - Built by SEO and AEO Experts - Content You'd Actually Publish, scored 6/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Personalized offer and quality signal ('Content You'd Actually Publish') are on-ICP but no proof and the compounding-system body is abstract.
AI Content Marketing Agency - AI-Powered Content Engine, scored 5/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Agency framing conflicts with the platform positioning elsewhere...' proof point is the most interesting thing.
AI Content That Converts - No Freelancers, No Guessing, scored 8/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Two named customers with hard numbers ('20x traffic, $270K pipeline', '300% growth in 1 year') make this the strongest proof in the set.
The #1 AEO Agency, scored 7/10 against GrowthX’s ideal buyer. Named customers and AEO specificity earn the click, but '#1' claim lacks backing.

See GrowthX’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.