Where Teleport's ads lose the buyer
Teleport is running 5 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.2 out of 10, and 1 ad needs fixing. Each ad below is one of Teleport’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.
Teleport’s live ads, scored against their buyer
- Every piece of software is hackable. Every agent needs a security boundary. Ever, scored 7/10 against Teleport’s ideal buyer. Sharp threat framing with AI agent security angle lands well for security leaders, but no concrete offer or CTA closes the loop.
- I recently built an AI SRE agent for a client but it almost got hacked. The agen, scored 5/10 against Teleport’s ideal buyer. Practitioner story hook is relatable but the influencer-style creative signals individual dev content, not enterprise security buying.
- Teleport's Q2 2026 in under 2 minutes. In a quarter marked by cost volatility an, scored 4/10 against Teleport’s ideal buyer. Quarterly recap framing reads as internal update, not a demand-gen offer aimed at infrastructure security buyers.
- Most enterprises now have more machine and agent identities than people, and a l, scored 8/10 against Teleport’s ideal buyer. Breach-tied stat on machine identity proliferation hits the ICP pain precisely, and the layered identity stack visual reinforces product depth.
- We spent the last decade drilling specific themes into every engineering org. El, scored 7/10 against Teleport’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership article on AI identity security is timely for the ICP but the content offer is soft and no urgency or outcome is stated.
See Teleport’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.
Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.