How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Foleon's ads lose the buyer

Foleon is running 10 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7.2 out of 10, and 1 ad needs fixing. Each ad below is one of Foleon’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Foleon’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Foleon keeps humans and agents on brand and on track., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Pain is vivid and specific but no proof or CTA to convert the recognition into action.
Foleon makes content production faster and more reliable., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Creative metaphor lands hard on the design-bottleneck pain but the body stays generic and no proof or offer closes the gap.
Create assets today’s audience will actually engage with., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Creative hook is the strongest of the three.
Only Foleon tells you how your assets are really performing., scored 8/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Sharp pain hook and specific tracking gap land well, but no CTA or next step to convert the click.
Create and ship fully compliant, on-brand sales assets faster., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Vivid design-bottleneck pain resonates with the ICP but the value claim stays vague and no CTA closes the loop.
Only Foleon tells you how your assets are really performing., scored 8/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Specific number on the creative makes the tracking-blindness pain visceral, but no CTA or proof of Foleon's outcome follows.
Get AI-assisted creation, but with enterprise-level control., scored 8/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Witty brand-control hook with a vivid visual proof of the risk lands sharply for the ICP, though no explicit CTA converts the moment.
With Foleon, production goes up. Cost and risk don’t., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Pain is real and the creative is vivid but the headline value claim is abstract and no CTA or proof closes the argument.
Give your readers a format they’ll actually engage with., scored 7/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Crisp contrast headline and mobile-PDF visual nail the format pain, but the value proposition stays generic with no CTA or proof.
Foleon makes your content interactive and engaging., scored 6/10 against Foleon’s ideal buyer. Creative hook is blunt and relatable but the headline 'makes your content interactive and engaging' is a generic category claim with no proof or CTA.

See Foleon’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.