How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where EasyDMARC's ads lose the buyer

EasyDMARC is running 24 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.6 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of EasyDMARC’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

EasyDMARC’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Your Checklist May Be Incomplete, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Strong ICP hook and real speakers add credibility, but the body copy cuts off before the specific myth payoff.
member logo, scored 6/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Timely threat angle is relevant to the ICP but the headline 'member logo' signals a capture artifact on the headline field, and the body cuts before the product tie-in lands.
Email Security Is Not a Checklist, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Myth-busting framing resonates with security practitioners who assume they are covered, but a Customer Success moderator signals lower technical authority than the four-speaker version.
Check What Your Domain Is Missing, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Clear threat statement and free CTA land well, but no proof or differentiator separates EasyDMARC from any DMARC tool.
See How EasyDMARC Fixes This, scored 8/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. University-specific spoofable addresses make the threat viscerally concrete for the exact ICP segment, with a frictionless CTA.
Start Enforcement with EasyDMARC, scored 8/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. The p=none visual and three-step enforcement ladder speak directly to the stuck-at-monitoring pain the ICP lives in daily.
Start Enforcement with EasyDMARC, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Concrete inbox mockup showing unauthorized senders delivered is compelling, but the university framing narrows reach without adding proof.
Email Security Myths Teams Still Trust, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Named speaker and specific infrastructure framing earn credibility, but no myth is teased so the click incentive stays weak.
Protect Future Students, scored 8/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Domain-level scan result plus spoofed admissions email mock and social proof number make the risk immediate and credible for higher ed IT.
member logo, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Strong POV reframe that speaks directly to multi-sender domain complexity, but no CTA or offer means no demand-gen conversion path.
See How EasyDMARC Fixes This, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Spoofed admissions mock is vivid and on-segment, but lacks the social proof line that ad 5 carries, making it slightly less persuasive.
member logo, scored 5/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Creative names the platform clearly.
DMARC SPF DKIM BIMI Deliverability, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Keyword-rich headline matches high-intent queries well, free signup and tool sitelinks add utility.
EasyDMARC Official Website SPF, scored 4/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Generic branded headline wastes high-intent traffic with no specific outcome or differentiator.
DMARC Record Checker Verify, scored 8/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Social proof of 25,000 plus teams and spoofing pain point make this the strongest demand-gen match.
Free Email Deliverability Inbox Test, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Free tool with specific inbox placement detail earns the click from deliverability-focused buyers.
Free MX Lookup Record Checker, scored 5/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Headline targets a narrow diagnostic tool while body pivots to broad platform pitch, creating mismatch.
Advanced SPF Testing Tool, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Pain-first body copy naming errors, lookup issues, and alignment problems speaks directly to the technical buyer.
Check DMARC Record Instantly, scored 8/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Seconds-free-no-card promise with policy, alignment, and fixes delivers a tight, specific outcome for the searcher.
DMARC Setup Enterprise SPF Management, scored 7/10 against EasyDMARC’s ideal buyer. Enterprise framing and 25,000+ teams proof land well.

See EasyDMARC’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.