Where ComboCurve's ads lose the buyer

ComboCurve is running 4 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of ComboCurve’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

ComboCurve’s live ads, scored against their buyer

  • ComboCurve, scored 4/10 against ComboCurve’s ideal buyer. Three-line formula is the weakest of the ComBot variants, adding nothing specific over 'get answers, make decisions'.
  • Our Haynesville full report will be available next week. Make sure to fill out t, scored 7/10 against ComboCurve’s ideal buyer. Named basin, real well data, and operator names give strong asset value but the gating mechanic buried in comments adds friction.
  • ComboCurve, scored 5/10 against ComboCurve’s ideal buyer. Logistics are clear but no reason to meet beyond a generic chat about ComboCurve.
  • The full 2026 ComboCurve Haynesville Report is out. The headline: the best wells, scored 8/10 against ComboCurve’s ideal buyer. Named basin, ranked 2,022 wells, and a non-obvious finding hook make this a genuinely valuable free asset for the ICP.

See ComboCurve’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.