How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B SaaS spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Clickhouse's ads lose the buyer

Clickhouse is running 21 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.5 out of 10, and 0 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Clickhouse’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Clickhouse’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Get early access to ClickStack Cloud, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Zero-pipeline promise is compelling but 'coming soon' kills urgency for engineers ready to act now.
FREE instructor-led training with hands-on labs., scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Hands-on Postgres plus ClickHouse integration is ICP-relevant but the free hook overshadows the technical outcome.
⁠⁠Introducing ClickHouse On-Demand Compute, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Hypothetical hook directly addresses the ICP pain of intensive queries needing burst compute, named speaker adds credibility.
⁠⁠Introducing ClickHouse On-Demand Compute, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Same strong query-pain hook as the light variant, dark creative is equally readable and ICP-matched.
Open House Munich, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Strong speaker roster from Deutsche Bank and Adobe signals ICP credibility but no technical outcome is stated.
FREE instructor-led training with hands-on labs., scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Broad workload claim with real-time analytics and observability use cases maps well to ICP pain, free hands-on format lowers friction.
⁠⁠Introducing ClickHouse On-Demand Compute, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Body copy explicitly names data engineers, platform teams, and architects, making role fit the clearest of the three On-Demand variants.
ClickHouse Lounge São Paulo, scored 5/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Brand and community event post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.
⁠⁠Introducing ClickHouse On-Demand Compute, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Relevant feature for the ICP but webinar format and vague hook limit urgency to click.
Fastest Data Warehouse Open Source, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Speed and cost promise land squarely on ICP pain, free trial CTA and sitelinks add pull.
ClickHouse Cloud Faster Queries, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Speed and cost headline hits core ICP pain, free trial chip reinforces action, body truncates before proof.
Database for AI Vector Search, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. AI and vector angle fits ML pipeline buyers but misrepresents ClickHouse core strength, diluting ICP fit.
ClickStack OTel Observability Free Trial, scored 8/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Direct Datadog displacement claim with no-SKU pricing hits observability buyers exactly where it hurts.
o11y Stack Used by Tesla, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Tesla name-drop is strong social proof but body stays generic without a cost or scale claim.
o11y Stack Used by Tesla, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Tesla anchor grabs attention but body drops the Datadog displacement angle, leaving cost claim vague.
Sub-Second Query Postgres Replication, scored 7/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Sub-second speed headline nails the ICP promise, Postgres replication angle narrows to a real migration trigger.
O11y Stack Used by Tesla, scored 8/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Named customer and vertical hook land hard for observability-stack builders.
Developers Prefer Us Cloud, scored 5/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Better compression and lower cost are real but vague, no scale or latency specifics.
Faster Queries Free Trial, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. Trial CTA and speed promise are solid.
Fastest Data Warehouse Claim, scored 6/10 against Clickhouse’s ideal buyer. 100K developer social proof is credible but superlative headline lacks any latency or scale anchor.

See Clickhouse’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.