How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B SaaS spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Blitzapi's ads lose the buyer

Blitzapi is running 11 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6 out of 10, and 1 ad needs fixing. Each ad below is one of Blitzapi’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Blitzapi’s live ads, scored against their buyer

member logo, scored 4/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Creative promotes a Claude Code tutorial, not BlitzAPI, leaving the product invisible to the buyer.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Specific use case is relevant but empty workflow screenshot kills the proof before it lands.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Developer-readable API schema and real endpoint shown make the feature tangible for a technical buyer.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Brand momentum post with a growth chart but no clear offer or buyer hook.
member logo, scored 6/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Website relaunch framing buries the sharp 'Unlimited B2B Data Infra for GTM Builders' value prop visible on the creative.
member logo, scored 6/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Data-rich creative shows real coverage stats.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Provocative POV with dense multi-provider proof data directly attacks a real buyer pain around TAM loss.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Concrete new feature with a specific use-case example speaks directly to GTM builders who need intent signals.
member logo, scored 8/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Named API product, real-time data proof chips, and a developer CTA make a tight case for the builder ICP.
member logo, scored 6/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Founder story angle is relatable but the creative shows a trial dashboard with no clear outcome for the cold viewer.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Brand/website reveal post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.

See Blitzapi’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.