How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B SaaS spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Blitzapi's ads lose the buyer

Blitzapi is running 11 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.5 out of 10, and 0 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Blitzapi’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Blitzapi’s live ads, scored against their buyer

member logo, scored 6/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Third-party mention adds credibility but creative hijacks attention away from BlitzAPI's own value prop.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Specific use case is on-ICP but empty workflow canvas kills the proof and the offer stays vague.
member logo, scored 8/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Real API schema shown with precise filter fields speaks directly to builders doing programmatic TAM targeting.
member logo, scored 6/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Volume proof is compelling but the founder check-in framing buries the infrastructure story for cold ICP buyers.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Website creative lands the ICP phrase and social proof logos, but the body copy is a brand comeback announcement, not a demand hook.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Data-coverage chart with 318M contacts and filter breakdowns speaks directly to the TAM-building pain, but the body hook is too abstract to stop the scroll alone.
member logo, scored 8/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Multi-panel proof showing provider variance and 70 percent discarded TAM makes the data-quality pain viscerally real for outbound builders.
member logo, scored 7/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Feature announcement is on-ICP for GTM builders but the example use case targets manufacturers, a segment outside the sweet-spot, diluting relevance.
member logo, scored 8/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Real-time hiring signals at scale with live data widgets and a direct CTA hits the programmatic TAM and signal-layer pain squarely.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Brand or culture post framing a founder-to-trial-user moment; not a demand-gen ad, judge it on brand lift not buyer fit.
member logo, scored 5/10 against Blitzapi’s ideal buyer. Brand/website reveal post, not a demand-gen ad; judge it on brand lift, not buyer fit.

See Blitzapi’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.