Where Aviatrix's ads lose the buyer
Aviatrix is running 15 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 7.5 out of 10, and 2 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Aviatrix’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.
Aviatrix’s live ads, scored against their buyer
- Learn More, scored 7/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Sharp shared-responsibility hook lands the pain, but 'Learn More' CTA and no proof cap the score.
- Read the crypto agility report, scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Concrete mechanism ('one policy push') and named asset make this the strongest of the three, though no preview of report findings limits asset value.
- See the compliance gate, scored 7/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Objection-busting insight on the hardware-refresh gap is sharp, but 'See the compliance gate' CTA sends to unclear content with no proof or named mandate.
- Contain the Blast Radius of a Compromised Agent on the Infrastructure You Already Run., scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Live lab demo with a timed proof point lands hard for security engineers, but no named customer or outcome number caps the ceiling.
- Measure your harvest exposure, scored 7/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Crisp threat framing and a self-score CTA fit the ICP well, but no number or named outcome backs the urgency.
- Take the five-minute assessment, scored 7/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Cost-plus-security hook is a genuine differentiator, and the low-friction five-minute CTA fits cold LinkedIn well, but proof is absent.
- Ship Agents Faster. Contain What They Reach., scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Specific time-to-value number and triple negative proof ('no new nodes, no code changes, no security queue') make a compelling case for the security-plus-DevOps buyer.
- Measure your harvest exposure, scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Parallel headline is the sharpest threat articulation in the set and the free self-score with no login removes all friction, but no named customer or outcome number is present.
- Take the five-minute assessment, scored 7/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Same strong cost-plus-security hook as ad 2 with identical creative, solid ICP fit but still no proof and the dark-background variant adds no new signal.
- No Code Changes. No Sidecars., scored 9/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Real terminal output showing a live DENY rule against an attacker C2 is the strongest in-ad proof in the set, and 'Clone the blueprints' is a frictionless, engineer-native CTA.
- Ship Agents Faster. Contain What They Can Reach, scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Tension between shipping velocity and security review is a real ICP pain, and 'no sidecars, no SDK, transparent to agent code' is specific, but no proof or outcome number seals it.
- Score your network in five minutes, scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Sharp harvest-now-decrypt-later hook with zero-friction entry point, but no proof or named outcome.
- Read the healthcare brief, scored 8/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Precise vertical hook and crypto-agile framing land well, but the brief itself is not previewed so asset value is assumed.
- Wasting Money on NAT, scored 6/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Specific cost claim and 25% proof point are solid, but the message targets cost buyers not security ICP.
- You fix threats with Aviatrix, scored 6/10 against Aviatrix’s ideal buyer. Timely Google-Wiz hook is clever but the multi-part headline is cluttered and the offer is vague content not a clear next step.
See Aviatrix’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.
Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.