How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where AU10TIX's ads lose the buyer

AU10TIX is running 16 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.6 out of 10, and 8 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of AU10TIX’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

AU10TIX’s live ads, scored against their buyer

The credential checks out. Does the person?, scored 7/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. AI impersonation angle hits ICP pain, Microsoft co-brand adds credibility, but speakers are not compliance or fraud titles.
Everyone leaves Money20/20 with a tote bag. But almost nobody leaves with a head, scored 5/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Event presence post with no product hook or pain point for the compliance and fraud buyer.
Fraud never sees us coming., scored 6/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Event invite with face-scan visual lands on ICP, but copy stays generic with no fraud-specific hook.
Sleep easier. We've got fraud covered., scored 5/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Emotional hook is relatable but vague, and the event CTA competes with the reassurance message.
Fake faces out. Real customers in., scored 5/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Deepfake angle fits ICP pain but creative shows only the venue with no product signal or proof.
Authentication worked. But is it really you?, scored 8/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Microsoft co-brand, named speakers, and AI impersonation topic hit the ICP's sharpest pain point precisely.
Fraud never sees us coming., scored 6/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Punchy villain framing fits fraud-fighter ICP but creative and copy deliver no specific capability or proof.
AU10TIX Identity Verification - AU10TIX IDV Consortium Works, scored 7/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Deepfake pattern-detection claim is specific and credible, though sitelinks like 'We Love Fraud' undercut professionalism.
AU10TIX Identity Verification - Synthetic Fraud Detection, scored 8/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. KYC and synthetic fraud headline maps directly to ICP search intent, with strong sitelinks covering key use cases.
Trusted Biometric IDV, scored 8/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Gartner proof plus deepfake risk framing is a high-credibility offer perfectly matched to the ICP's evaluation stage.
AU10TIX Identity Verification - Synthetic Fraud Detection, scored 6/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Synthetic fraud hook is on-ICP but body is generic with no specific outcome or proof.
65% of all IDs are Digital, scored 6/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Stat-led hook grabs attention but body falls back on generic adjectives with no outcome.
Get Your Free Demo Today, scored 5/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Demo CTA is clear but 'outsmart fraud' is too vague to earn a click from a skeptical buyer.
KYC Online Verification, scored 7/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Volume qualifier targets enterprise KYC buyers precisely, though no outcome or proof follows.
AU10TIX vs Veriff: Results, scored 8/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Competitor comparison with speed and accuracy proof hits KYC buyers actively evaluating alternatives.
Jumio vs AU10TIX comparison, scored 9/10 against AU10TIX’s ideal buyer. Named enterprise logos plus direct competitor framing gives high-intent evaluators a compelling reason to click.

See AU10TIX’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.