How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Atolio's ads lose the buyer

Atolio is running 10 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.6 out of 10, and 4 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Atolio’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Atolio’s live ads, scored against their buyer

What makes self-hosted AI search different 👉, scored 6/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Architecture diagram teaches well but no proof, outcome, or CTA to convert the curious reader.
What makes self-hosted AI search different 👉, scored 7/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Provocative three-question frame hits the data-sovereignty nerve precisely but no next step beyond the teaser link.
See how it works 👉, scored 7/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Three concrete differentiators land squarely on data sovereignty pain but 'See how it works' CTA is vague for a cold feed.
What makes self-hosted AI search different?, scored 7/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Sharp role-specific hook on a real data-sovereignty fear, but no CTA or next step to convert curiosity.
Self-hosted AI search runs inside your network 👉, scored 7/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Provocative challenger framing lands well for security-conscious buyers, but no next step or payoff shown.
Self-hosted AI search runs inside your network 👉, scored 7/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Slightly stronger framing than ad 1 with 'the one question that matters', but still no payoff or next step.
See what makes self-hosted search different? 👉, scored 8/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Best in the set: shows the full architecture, names real tools, and lands a clear 'See how it works' CTA.
Self-hosted AI search runs inside your network 👉, scored 6/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Compelling insight on ingestion risk but reads like a social post, no product bridge or next step.
Use the LLM of Your Choice, scored 6/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. LLM flexibility and private cloud angle match the ICP query well, but 'Get granular...' truncation leaves the value unfinished.
AI Search That Delivers, scored 5/10 against Atolio’s ideal buyer. Headline is a generic category claim; 'the only' differentiator in the body is unsubstantiated and the CTA is absent.

See Atolio’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.