How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Aravo's ads lose the buyer

Aravo is running 18 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.7 out of 10, and 7 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Aravo’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Aravo’s live ads, scored against their buyer

A framework for scaling AI in your vendor risk program, scored 6/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Relevant pain but the hook stays conceptual with no proof or specific outcome to earn the click.
A practical look at proving your vendor risk program's value, scored 5/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Broad program-maturity angle lacks specificity and proof that would compel a senior risk buyer to stop scrolling.
Move from AI vision to impact with Aravo, scored 8/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Competitor displacement hook names a real, painful moment that a KY3P user in-market will immediately recognize.
A clear checklist for evaluating AI solutions for your risk program, scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Regulated-risk framing and checklist offer earn the click, but no proof or specificity on what makes AI fit for TPRM.
Continuous visibility across every vendor relationship, scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Annual-vs-continuous contrast lands the pain precisely, but blog CTA undersells urgency for a senior risk buyer.
Proven, Scalable Vendor Risk Management built for Financial Services, scored 8/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Vertical-specific proof stat plus KY3P migration hook gives a financial services risk buyer a concrete reason to click.
Turn trust into a competitive advantage, scored 5/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Reframing compliance as growth is interesting but too abstract to move a CRO or CCO evaluating a TPRM platform.
Your KY3P Migration Path Was Chosen For You. Your Platform Doesn't Have to Be., scored 8/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Directly intercepts KY3P migrants at decision moment with a sharp provocation that earns the read.
Trusted by 20% of the Fortune 100., scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Fortune 100 proof stat is strong but the creative leads with 'Life After KY3P' which requires insider context to land.
Aravo is the better choice for KY3P customers., scored 8/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. 17-vendor evaluation story is the most specific competitive proof in the set, directly validating the switch decision.
AI Native TPRM Intelligence Platform, scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Query-matched headline and predictive analytics outcome are solid, but 'Intelligence First Platform TM' leans jargon-heavy.
Aravo Risk Management Streamline, scored 5/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Correct category but body copy stays generic, no scale or outcome signal for enterprise buyers.
AI-Native TPRM Next-Gen Technology, scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. AI-native automation and predictive scoring at scale lands well for TPRM buyers, but proof is vague.
Find Hidden Risk Faster, scored 6/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Punchy headline but body copy stays surface-level, missing enterprise scale or regulatory specificity.
Vendor Risk Intelligence First Platform, scored 7/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Unifying procurement, compliance, and risk in one platform speaks directly to the enterprise TPRM buyer.
TPRM Confident Compliance At Scale, scored 8/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Real-time visibility across vendors and Nth parties with a maturity calculator sitelink earns the enterprise click.
Supplier Risk Continuous Monitoring, scored 6/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Continuous monitoring headline fits the ICP but body stays generic, no regulatory or scale proof.
Supplier Risk Procurement Visibility, scored 5/10 against Aravo’s ideal buyer. Procurement-team framing narrows the buyer and body copy adds no outcome beyond the headline restatement.

See Aravo’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.