How much time should I budget?

About 3 hours total, a working session and a review call. We do the heavy lifting.

What if I only want the roadmap, not the build?

That's the Campaign Repositioning Sprint. Ship it yourself, or upgrade to Done-For-You later.

Do you interview my customers?

Optional. We can mine your call recordings, reviews, and won/lost notes instead.

B2B teams spending $20K+/mo on ads whose demos aren't converting.

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you straight if it's a fit.

Where Allstacks's ads lose the buyer

Allstacks is running 13 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.2 out of 10, and 8 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Allstacks’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Allstacks’s live ads, scored against their buyer

Your token bill measures how much of your process knowledge nobody ever wrote do, scored 5/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Clever AI-cost angle but targets agent ops buyers, not engineering or product leaders in the ICP.
If you're a product manager, Allstacks turns your idea into a spec your engineer, scored 6/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. PM-focused spec promise is on-pain but copy targets the PM role, not the VP Eng or CTO decision-maker.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 7/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Concrete pain, code-aware spec promise, and free CTA make a solid PM-targeted offer with no proof.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 6/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Pain is real but hook and proof aim at PM, not VP Eng or CTO who owns delivery risk.
Invested in Copilot but still drowning in rework? Your AI agents are only as goo, scored 7/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Copilot hook nails the AI-rework pain, and stat-backed white paper adds credibility for a senior buyer.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 6/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Duplicate-work pain resonates with Eng leaders but stops short of delivery-risk or financial consequence.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 6/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Developer-level ticket pain is vivid but speaks to an IC engineer, not a VP or Director making the buy.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 7/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Before-after comparison is clear and specific, but explicit PM targeting narrows away from the senior Eng buyer.
Two PMs. Both building with AI. Both had the same three features to define this , scored 6/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Contrast story format is engaging and pain is real, but buyer role stays at PM level, not VP Eng or finance.
AI product management for agentic development., scored 7/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Pain hook lands well and free CTA lowers friction, but targets PM not the engineering or finance buyer.
3 steps to launch on time when the roadmap keeps shifting, scored 5/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Thought-leadership content with a named Meta speaker adds credibility but no product offer or ICP pain signal.
Allstacks Official Site, scored 5/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Correct buyer role named but 'agentic AI platform' is generic with no pain, proof, or specific outcome.
Faros AI Alt In 48 Hours - Faros AI Plus AI Agents - Better Than Far..., scored 7/10 against Allstacks’s ideal buyer. Competitor comparison with a concrete 48-hour claim is a strong differentiator for a high-intent searcher evaluating alternatives.

See Allstacks’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.