Where Algonomy's ads lose the buyer

Algonomy is running 5 live ads on LinkedIn and Google. Their average fit to their own ideal buyer is 6.4 out of 10, and 3 ads need fixing. Each ad below is one of Algonomy’s real live creatives, read straight from the ad libraries.

Algonomy’s live ads, scored against their buyer

• 30% Higher CTR Guaranteed - Beyond Basic Merge Tags, scored 8/10 against Algonomy’s ideal buyer. Specific guaranteed outcome with social proof lands hard for high-intent searchers.
• eCommerce Email Platform - Get a Free Demo, scored 6/10 against Algonomy’s ideal buyer. Clear vertical and CTA but value prop stays at category level with no proof or outcome.
• Better Movable Ink Alternative - AI-Powered Email Content, scored 7/10 against Algonomy’s ideal buyer. Named rival captures bottom-funnel switchers but lacks a proof point to close the argument.
• Email Personalization Platform, scored 5/10 against Algonomy’s ideal buyer. Category claim with no proof, number, or outcome to earn the click.
• 3X Your Email Revenue, scored 6/10 against Algonomy’s ideal buyer. Specific revenue claim and ESP compatibility hook land well, but no proof backs the 3X figure.

See Algonomy’s full live-ad board on AdRoast. Every creative scored against their ICP, with the exact fix for each.

Learn the method behind these scores: the AdRoast guides cover how to audit your ads against your ICP and why clicks do not turn into pipeline.