A page that sells accuracy.
And can’t keep its own numbers straight.
The Snyk comparison page has the right strategy and fights its own execution. The ad leads with a screenshotable stat, 17.5 hours vs 26 minutes, plus an elite logo wall (Dropbox, Snowflake, Figma, GitLab) and a real third-party benchmark. Then the landing page says 2.5 hours, not 26 minutes, so a page selling accuracy cannot keep its own numbers straight. And a $100 gift card pulls gift-card hunters, not AppSec leaders.
The teardown, on LinkedIn
What the teardown found · tap to open each one
The ad leads with a number you could screenshot, 17.5 hours vs 26 minutes, backs it with recognizable logos (Dropbox, Snowflake, Figma, GitLab), and cites a real third-party benchmark. For a competitive-displacement play against Snyk, that is the right opening.
The ad says 26 minutes. The landing page says 2.5 hours. A page whose entire argument is accuracy cannot keep its own headline number straight between the ad and the destination, and a skeptical AppSec buyer will notice.
Make every number match. Pick the real figure and use it identically in the ad, the page and the benchmark, so the accuracy claim survives the click.
The incentive attracts gift-card hunters, not AppSec leaders. It inflates form fills with people who will never buy and buries the real buyers in the noise.
Drop the gift card, or gate it behind a qualifying step, so the page measures intent instead of rewarding tourists.
Questions, answered
This is Marina Kogan’s original teardown of Semgrep’s live ad. See the full infographic on LinkedIn →
More teardowns
Your ads, roasted the same way
Pull your live ads, score each against your buyer, see where the click leaks.